| 000 | 00952cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39423 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16588 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLloyds Bank Ltd v Rosset and Rosset | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v138(6358) 27 May 1988, 149-150(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 13 May 1988. When a wife claims that she has a beneficial interest in a house registered in her husband`s name and that her interest has priority over the rights of a mortgagee under a legal charge executed without her knowledge, then in order to claim the protection afforded to overriding interests by Land Registration Act 1925 s70(1)(g) , the wife must have been in actual occupation of the house when the charge was executed as distinct from being in occupation when the charge was registered. | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10941 _d10941 |
||