| 000 | 01103cad a22002295a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E148083 | ||
| 008 | 090722e20090710xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u148083 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 050 | 0 | 4 | _a346.4104342 $2 18 |
| 100 | 1 | _aJohns, Alan | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aMaitland Chambers case study _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_aS.l. _bProperty Litigation Association _c2009 |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aMaitland Chambers Case Study | |
| 520 | _aLooks at a case where a shopping centre lease requires each tenant to contribute a specified percentage to the service charge, but where there is no specification that the charges must be fair and reasonable. Discusses what tenants can do when they feel that the charges are too high and believe that other contractors could supply on better terms. Examines relevant case law. | ||
| 521 | _aAdvanced | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-SERVICE CHARGES | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.pla.org.uk/library/maitland_chambers_case_studies _zView the item free of charge at www.pla.org.uk... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c109875 _d109875 |
||