| 000 | 00833cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2532-14 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16717 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRefurbishment work does not amount to construction | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v11/8/89 p30 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Barth v Pritchard and Another , CA 27 July 1989, it was held that the landlords were not entitled to oppose the grant of a new tenancy on the ground that they required possession to carry out refurbishment work. The works entailed non-structural internal works which did not constitute "substantial works of construction" under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f) . | ||
| 650 | _aIMPROVEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11046 _d11046 |
||