| 000 | 00953cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39444 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16792 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aStephenson, I. | ||
| 245 | _aGoodbye Junior Books | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v138(6344) 8 July 1988, 483-485(3) |
||
| 520 | _aTwo recent Court of Appeal decisions Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass Ltd (See Abstract 38904) and Greater Nottingham Co-operative Society v Cementation Piling and Foundations Ltd (See WB2415-19) appear to have overturned the Junior Books ruling that recovery of economic loss alone by the main contractor from the nominated subcontractor was possible. In this article, the author discusses the reasons why he welcomes this development. | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11107 _d11107 |
||