| 000 | 01128cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X1398 | ||
| 008 | 090401t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16817 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNorth West Leicestershire DC and Hitchinson Microtel Ltd | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning Appeal Decisions _v(194) 9 PAD 252-259(8) |
||
| 520 | _aDecision letter 16 November 1993. Location of telecommunication tower - conflicting requirements of protection of visial amenity and network need - alternative solutions proposed by council rejected by Inspector as technically unacceptable of likely to generate more harm to visual amenity that appellenant`s scheme - detrimental effect of scheme of SSSI considered to be not significant - appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 01/1985 | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 08/1993 | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 | ||
| 650 | _aPPG8 | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S78 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11127 _d11127 |
||