| 000 | 00966cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3013-18 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16851 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aInsuring obligation | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1994) EGCS 53(1) (26/3/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"Havenridge Ltd v Boston Dyers Ltd" CA 11 March 1994. At issue was whether the landlord was `properly` exercising a right to demand payment to meet an insuring obligation in the lease. The lease term `Properly` was taken to mean `legitimately` and despite the high figure in dispute, the claim was judged to have been served correctly. Decision upheld on appeal. | ||
| 650 | _aIMPLIED TERMS | ||
| 650 | _aINSURING OBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aPREMIUM | ||
| 690 |
_aInsurance _96249 |
||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11153 _d11153 |
||