000			01325cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS55496
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16949
041			_aeng
245			_aElcock and Elcock v Newham LBC
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1996] RVR 151-157(7)
520			_aLT 7 February 1996. Determination whether the counter notice served by the council in response to a blight notice served by the claimants (E) could be upheld. At issue was whether land was blighted with the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sch 13 para 2. The house concerned was subject to policy 4 of the Stratford and Canning Town District Plan. "Held" although the property was located in a blighted area, E had not discharged the onus of proof that the site fell within the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sch 13 para 2. Claim dismissed.
650			_aBLIGHT NOTICE
650			_aELCOCK AND ELCOCK V NEWHAM LBC
650			_aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
650			_aSTATUTORY LOCAL PLAN
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 SCHED 13 PARA 2
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11226 _d11226