000			01093cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS55497
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16957
041			_aeng
245			_aHenriques v Swale BC
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1996] 36 RVR 162-165(5)
520			_aLT 23 May 1995. H sought compensation for refusal of consent by S to clear fell coppice woodland included in a tree preservation order. H claimed the notice of refusal did not include a valid art 5 certificate because the wording was inappropriate, the notice was not signed by the planning officer, and the issue of good forestry had not been investigated. "Held" the certificate had been properly issued.
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCONSENT TO FELL
650			_aHENRIQUES V SWAL BC
650			_aREFUSAL
650			_aTREE PRESERVATION ORDER
650			_aWOODLAND
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11231 _d11231