| 000 | 01412cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55501 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16983 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWakeley and another v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1996] 36 RVR 165-180(16) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 2 April 1996. The claimants sought compensation for the effects of a new fire station upon the values of their homes. Through use of indices and comparison of sale prices of nearby houses they claimed diminution in value of 33%. The defendants claimed noise control measures in place and that the claimant`s use of indices did not account for local market conditions or property types. There was therefore no evidence of diminution in value. "Held" compensation payable at £24,000 for first claimant and £12,500 for the second. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aDIMINUTION IN VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aFIRE STATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 PART I | ||
| 650 | _aLT DECISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aNOISE POLLUTION | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC WORKS | ||
| 650 | _aVALUES | ||
| 650 | _aWAKELEY AND ANOTHER V LONDON FIRE AND CIVIL DEFENCE AUTHORITY | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11250 _d11250 |
||