000			01438cad a22002175a 4500
001			L153412
008			110722s2011 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u153412
041	0		_aeng
110	2		_aCMS Cameron McKenna _95874
245	0	0	_aConstruction adjudication _bdraft decisions and apparent bias _h[electronic resource]
260			_aLondon _bCMS Cameron McKenna LLP _c2011
490		0	_aLaw-Now Article
520			_aExplains the two primary grounds on which the courts will refuse to uphold an adjudicator's decision - where the adjudicator lacked or exceeded his jurisdiction and where the adjudicator's decision or the adjudication itself was affected by a failure to afford natural justice. Looks at Lanes v Galliford Try which is the first reported instance of its kind in adjudication and highlights the dangers of adjudicators expressing preliminary views on matters before they have heard the full arguments of the parties.
590			_aKA NTK
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.law-now.com/DirectMail/%7BAFCA023C-17BB-4A9A-8700-C8D04C32A25F%7D_ConAdjJul11.htm _zRegister for this free online information service at www.law-now.com
942			_n0
999			_c112504 _d112504