| 000 | 01514cad a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L153929 | ||
| 008 | 110923s2011 xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u153929 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBebb, David | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDamages in respect of defective work, loss of amenity, distress and inconvenience _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_a[S.l.] _bFenwick Elliott _c2011 |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the case of Harrison and Others v (1) Shepherd Homes Ltd, (2) National Housebuilding Council & (3) NHBC Building Control Services Ltd, [2011] EWHC 1811 (TCC), how this case represents extremely useful guidance as to the assessment of damages in respect of defective construction work. Whilst the starting point will usually be the cost of reinstatement, claimants still have a number of other hurdles to clear. If the cost of reinstatement is unreasonable then the measure of damages will be by reference to the property's diminution in value and not the reinstatement costs. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 710 | 1 |
_aFenwick Elliott _95892 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.mondaq.com/x/145084/Property+Litigation/Damages+In+Respect+Of+Defective+Work+Loss+Of+Amenity+Distress+And+Inconvenience&email_access=on _zView this item free of charge at www.fenwickelliot.com |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c112769 _d112769 |
||