| 000 | 01371cad a22002295a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L154590 | ||
| 008 | 120103s2011 xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u154590 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 110 | 2 |
_aStrutt & Parker _92509 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aIPD/S&P business parks index _bAutumn 2011 _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_aLondon _bStrutt & Parker _bIPD _c2011 |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aIPD/S& P Business Parks Index | |
| 520 | _aAnalyses the performance of Strutt & Parker (S&P) parks in direct comparison to IPD parks and IPD urban offices. S&P Parks outperformed their peers, but underperformed the IPD UK Annual Index and IPD UK Offices. The main driver of performance was yield compression. For the first time since 2006, there was positive net investment in S&P Parks in 2010 caused by increased purchase expenditure and dwindling disposals. Leases signed in 2010 were found to be shorter compared to previously signed leases. | ||
| 590 | _aNTK KA | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT | ||
| 710 | 1 |
_aInvestment Property Databank _92288 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.struttandparker.com/publications-and-research/research/business-parks-index-2011 _zView this index free of charge at www.struttandparker.com |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c113051 _d113051 |
||