000			01452cad a22002055a 4500
001			L154603
008			120105e2011 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154603
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aThe Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire Authority v Gladman Commercial Properties and Nottingham City Council
260			_c2011
520			_a[2011] EWHC 1918 (Ch), 20 April 2011. Should important evidence be allowed some time after a case has started?. Claimant NFA agreed to sell a fire station to Defendant and Part 20 Claimant G in 2007. Part 20 Defendant N agreed to sell adjacent land to G at the same time. G refused to complete both purchases, claiming fraudulent misrepresentation of the site by the agents of NFA and N. NFA and N wanted to call on evidence from a key witness after the beginning of the trial. G contended that it was unfair and costly to allow this late evidence. "Held": the evidence was allowed but G should be compensated for the delay.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aNOTTINGHAMSHIRE AND CITY OF NOTTINGHAM FIRE AUTHORITY V GLADMAN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aCLAIRE SWAIN-MASON AND ORS V MILLS & REEVE (A FIRM)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1918.html _zView the report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c113060 _d113060