000			01443cad a22002295a 4500
001			L154647
008			120109e20100903xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154647
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aHKRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Marcus Alexander Heaney _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2010
520			_a[2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch), 3 September 2010. Considers the granting of an injunction to prevent interference with an adjoining owner?s rights of light or whether damages would be an adequate remedy - the first important reported case involving a completed scheme. Claimant HK's commercial scheme in Leeds blocked defendant HE's light. HK sought to prevent an injunction in favour of HE and wanted to pay damages instead as an injunction would mean changing HK's building. "Held": in favour of defendant HE. HE was given the injunction and did not have to accept damages that he did not want.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHKRUK II (CHC) LTD V HEANEY
650	2	4	_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO LTD 1895
650	2	4	_aWROTHAM PARK ESTATE CO V PARKSIDE HOMES LTD
650	2	4	_aTAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2245.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c113083 _d113083