000			01760cad a22002535a 4500
001			L154667
008			120111e20100804xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154667
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aSummerfield Stores Ltd v Spring (Sutton Coldfield) Ltd (in administration) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2010
520			_a[2010] EWHC 2084 (Ch), 4 August 2010. Appellant business tenant SU appealed against the dismissal of its application for summary judgment to dismiss the opposition by the respondent landlord SP of its application for new tenancies. Was a tenant who had applied for summary judgment of the ground of opposition entitled to that judgment if he could show that the landlord had no real prospect of establishing the requisite intention at a date determined by reference to the date of the summary judgment hearing rather than the date of a prospective trial?. The court dismissed SU's application. SU appealed. "Held": appeal dismissed. The date of the hearing at which the necessary intention had to be shown to exist was always the date of the substantive trial of the landlord's ground of objection.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSUMMERFIELD STORES LTD V SPRING (SUTTON COLDFIELD) LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
650	2	4	_aDUTCH OVEN LTD V EGHAM ESTATE AND INVESTMENT CO LTD
650	2	4	_aBETTY'S CAFES LTD V PHILLIPS FURNISHING STORES LTD (NO 1)
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S 26
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S 30(1)(F)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aCommercial property _96227
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2084.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c113093 _d113093