000			01622cad a22002655a 4500
001			L154687
008			120112e20091203xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154687
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aVan Dal Footwear Ltd v Ryman Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWCA Civ 1478, 3 December 2009. Appellant landlord V sued Respondent tenant R for a breach of its repairing obligations. The judge capped the damages for breach of the repairing covenant at approximately £48 500, which was the difference between the value of the fully repaired premises and the current value of the premises. He went on to conclude that R would have offered to take a new lease from the purchaser, which would have increased the current value of the premises by approximately 7.4 per cent. V appealed against the amount of damages awarded for the breach. "Held": appeal allowed. The judge was wrong to have taken into account the likelihood that a former tenant would take a new lease. The judge had valued the wrong thing and the 7.4% increase could not stand.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aVAN DAL FOOTWEAR LTD V RYMAN LTD
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927 S18(1)
650	2	4	_aSMILEY V TOWNSHEND
650	2	4	_aJACQUIN V HOLLAND
650	2	4	_aHANSON V NEWMAN
650	2	4	_aINLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS V CLAY
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aCommercial property _96227
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/1478.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c113105 _d113105