000			01405cad a22002415a 4500
001			L154706
008			120116e20091207xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154706
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aGoldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in administration) _h[electronic resource]
520			_a[2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch), 7 December 2009. Applicant landlord G applied for the rent of business premises to be paid as an expense of the administration of the respondent company N. "Held": Application granted. Rent would continue to be payable as an administration expense quarterly in advance under the terms of two leases so long as the administrators retained or used any part of the premises demised for the benefit of the administration. The court had no discretion to consider how much it would be fair for the administrators to pay in this case.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aGOLDACRE (OFFICES) LTD v NORTEL NETWORKS UK LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
650	2	4	_aINSOLVENCY RULES 1986 R2 67(1)(A)
650	2	4	_aINSOLVENCY RULES 1986 R4 218(1)(A)
650	2	4	_aAPPORTIONMENT ACT 1870
650	2	4	_aRE LUNDY GRANITE CO
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aCommercial property _96227
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2009/3389.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c113113 _d113113