000			01487cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS23460
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u17145
041			_aeng
245			_aDresden Estates Ltd v Collinson
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v281 (6326) 21 March 1987, 1321-1327 (4)
520			_aCA 30 January 1987. Appeal by plaintiff owners of workshop and store from decision of cc who held that the defendant occupier was a tenant and refused the plaintiffs order for possession . At issue was whether the occupier of the premises was a tenant or a licensee . The written agreement between the parties described itself throughout as a licence , emphasised that exclusive possession was not conferred and provided that licensees could be moved from time to time to other premises, but included provisions normally found in tenancies. Several decisions were considered including Street v Mountford (Abstract 34734), which concerned residential premises. CA considered that this decision was not applicable to business tenancies, but approved a passage from Halsbury`s Laws of England as an accurate summary of the law. CA held that looking at the agreement as a whole, the indications were in favour of a licence, especially with regard to the provision by which the occupier could be moved t
650			_aLEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11367 _d11367