000			01593cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS23463
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u17167
041			_aeng
245			_aSurrey Heath BC v SoS for the Environment and Elliot Developments Ltd
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1987) JPL 199-202(4)
520			_aQBD 30 October 1986. Appeal by council against decision of Inspector to grant planning permission for an office development in Camberley , Surrey previously refused by the council. The Inspector based his decision primarily on government policy reflected in DoE Circular 14/85 Development and Employment, which encourages development which creates jobs. The Inspector granted permission even though the proposal was contrary to the approved Local Plan. The Inspector concluded that the need for economic regeneration outweighed all objections of the council. The council appealed to the High Court, alleging that the Inspector was so anxious to comply the job creation message of the Circular, that he paid no proper regard to local needs and local policy as reflected in the Surrey Structure Plan and the Surrey Heath Local Plan . Though nationally there was a need to promote economic activity, the need was greater in places of high unemployment. QBD found that a proper interpretation and imple
650			_aEMPLOYMENT CONSIDERATIONS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S245
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11384 _d11384