000			01362cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS39504
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u17207
041			_aeng
100			_aMurdoch, S.
245			_aStatutory protection and the requirement for residence
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8827) 9 July 1988, 85(1)
520			_aIf a public or private residential tenancy is to qualify for protection as a statutory or secure tenancy , the tenant must satisfy that he or she uses the property as his home . However, the language used by the two different types of tenancy is not the same and this article discusses three recent cases Crawley Borough Council v Sawyer , Islington London Borough v Ismail (1988) and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1988) (See Abstract 39345) which considered whether there is any difference between the requirements for secure and statutory tenancies and if so, to what extent.
650			_aCOUNCIL HOUSING
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985 S81
650			_aPRIVATE RENTED SECTOR
650			_aRENT ACT 1977 S2
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11411 _d11411