| 000 | 01568cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39505 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17211 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDurman and Others v Bell | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(8826) 2 July 1988, 105-108(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 1 February 1988. Appeal by landlords (D) from cc decision dismissing possession proceedings relating to a house on a farm, occupied by a former agricultural worker (B). B had been employed by the former owner of the farm (T) and occupied the house free of rent. T sold the farm, including the house to D. B continued to occupy the house free of rent and carried out relief milking for D one day a week. When B started a small builder`s business, he ceased his milking commitment, but continued to pay no rent. A threat of possession proceedings resulted in an application to register a fair rent under the Rent (Agriculture) Act 1976 . A fair rent was fixed and paid accordingly. Eventually D complained that B was running a builder `s business from the house and possession proceedings followed, D alleging that B`s statutory tenancy under the 1976 Act was automatically terminated when he used the premises for business. Cc judge held that there could not be an automatic termination of a stat | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY | ||
| 650 | _aCHERYL INVESTMENTS LTD V SALDANHA | ||
| 650 | _aTIED HOUSE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11414 _d11414 |
||