000			01525cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS39507
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u17219
041			_aeng
245			_aCoronation Street Industrial Properties Ltd v Ingall Industries plc
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8830) 30 July 1988, 55-59(3)
520			_aCA 30 March 1988 Appeal by Ingall (I) from the decison of Rose J in favour of Coronation Street Industrial Properties (C), whereby I was held liable, as a surety under a lease which had been disclaimed, to accept a new lease of the demised premises with all the old terms and conditions. Under a clause in a 21-year lease I covenanted as a surety that in the event of the tenant`s going into liquidation and the leased being disclaimed, I would accept the lease of the demised premises. The landlord assigned the freehold reversion to C without any express assignment of the surety`s covenant . The tenant went into liquidation and the lease was disclaimed. The original landlord purported to assign to C the benefit of the covenant. I called on C to take a lease in accordance with the covenant and on C`s failure to do so, brought proceedings claiming specific performance against C which was upheld by Rose J. CA held, dismissing appeal, that 1) the court was bound by the decision Kumar v Dunni
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c11418 _d11418