| 000 | 01515cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39508 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17226 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aP & A Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group plc | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1988) 3 WLR 313-320(8) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 7 July 1988 Appeal by Combined English Stores Group (C) from QBD decision giving judgement for P & A Swift Investments (P) in the sum of £4,250 together with interest being the rent arrears due under the under lease . By an underlease, premises were leased to a subsidiary of C which as surety , guaranteed the undertenant`s obligations. The original landlords were wound up voluntarily and by a conveyance the leasehold reversion expectant upon the underlease was assigned by the liquidators to P. The conveyance did not contain any specific assignment of the benefit of the surety`s covenant . The undertenant defaulted on the rent for some time and then went into creditors` voluntarily winding up. When C refused to pay the rent P commenced proceedings in QBD to recover it. The judge found for P. On appeal by C by leave of the Appeal Committee, HL held, dismissing the appeal, that where a surety guaranteed by covenant that a tenant would pay the rent, in the event of the tenant`s defaul | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11422 _d11422 |
||