| 000 | 01111cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55558 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17310 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBritish Railways Board v Ringbest Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 30 EG 94-96(3) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 14 March 1996. B held a subunderlease from R subject to five-year rent reviews to the higher of the previous review period or 84.0253% of the market rent. B applied for leave to appeal against the arbitrator including a determination of a market rent higher than it might have been to reflect the lease having a geared rent review clause. Leave refused. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1979 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATORS' AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aBRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD V RINGBEST LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aIPSWICH BC V FISONS PLC | ||
| 650 | _aLEAVE TO APPEAL | ||
| 650 | _aMARKET RENT | ||
| 690 | _aARBITRATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11480 _d11480 |
||