| 000 | 01412cad a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L158715 | ||
| 008 | 110215n2013 000 0 eng u | ||
| 020 | _a9781783210305 | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u158715 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aDavenport, Philip | |
| 111 | 2 |
_aConstruction and Building Research Conference _cIIT Delhi, New Delhi _d10-12 September 2013 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aAdjudication in Australia _bClaim splitting in adjudication _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_aLondon _bRICS _c2013 |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aCOBRA _v2013 |
|
| 520 | _aA paper presented at the COBRA Conference in New Delhi on 10-12 September 2013. Looks at payment claim splitting in adjudication specifically relating to Australia. Considers the bars to claim splitting in litigation, the absence of bars to claim splitting in expert determination and contends that claim splitting in adjudication stands part way between the two. The paper points out the risks of claim splitting and suggests what an adjudicator should do when a claimant asks the adjudicator to determine only some of the items in a payment claim. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (COBRA) |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aADJUDICATION |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SECURITY OF PAYMENT ACT 1999 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCLAIMS SETTLEMENT |
| 651 | 4 | _aAustralia | |
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 700 | 1 | _aBrand, Michael C. | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c115471 _d115471 |
||