| 000 | 00935cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39568 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17509 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLee, J. | ||
| 245 | _aBread, cake and Adam`s ale | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating and Valuation _vJuly 1988, 201-202(2) |
||
| 520 | _aIn the light of the Government intention to reverse the Court of Appeal decision Cakebread v Severn Trent Water Authority (1987) (See Abstract 38858) concerning the question of whether certain hereditaments should be included in the cumulo value or not, this article reviews the background to the case, the court decision and how the Government proposes to overturn it. | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE BILL | ||
| 650 | _aRATES | ||
| 650 | _aWATER ACT 1973 | ||
| 650 | _aWATER | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11611 _d11611 |
||