| 000 | 01225cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55617 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17597 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBritish Telecommunications plc v Broadway (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v[1996] RA 272-296(13) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 18 March 1996. The ratepayers sought a quantity allowance against the rating of their premises that were by far the biggest on the out-of-town business park in which they were located. They contended that the premises be valued according to its size rather than the location. VO contended that the opposite was true, commenting that the ratepayers had produced no evidence of adjustment of rates to the antecedent valuation date, or that his adjustments were wrong. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aBRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC V BROADWAY (VO) | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS RATES | ||
| 650 | _aOFFICE BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aOUT-OF-TOWN BUSINESS PARKS | ||
| 650 | _aQUANTITY ALLOWANCE | ||
| 650 | _aRATEABLE VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11665 _d11665 |
||