| 000 | 01320cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55620 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u17608 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aO`Kelly v Davey (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v[1996] RA 238-245(4) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 24 April 1996. Ratepayer, who was permanently disabled, occupied a hereditament described in the non-domestic rating list as stores and premises, basement and part ground floor. He used the rest of the property as his residence. Ratepayer sought exemption from non-domestic rates on the grounds that the hereditament consisted of property used wholly for the provision of facilities for training or keeping suitably occupied persons who are disabled as set out in the Local Government Finance Act 1988 sch 5, para 16(1)(a). "Held" exemption did not apply because the condtions in sch 5 para 16(1)(a) were not satisfied. | ||
| 650 | _aDISABLED PEOPLE | ||
| 650 | _aEXEMPTION | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1988 SCH5 PARA 16 | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aNON-DOMESTIC RATES | ||
| 650 | _aOKELLY V DAVEY | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aWORKSHOP | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c11673 _d11673 |
||