000			01777cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS67684
008			040407n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u125780
245			_aSeeckts v Derwent
260			_c2004
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 293, 30 March 2004. Dispute between the defendants (D) and the claimant (S) over a hedge between their properties. D appealed against the County Court decision that S was the owner of the hedge destroyed by D, the grant awarding damages to S and an injunction to restrain further trespass by D. The properties had been divided in 1968 by a conveyance and ownership of the hedge rested on a map from that conveyance. The County Court had decided that ownership of the hedge was determined by T-marks but D contended that not enough weight had been given to the dimensions in the map. "Held": that there was a hedge on the boundary and that the T-marks are normally understood to represent a boundary. The dimensions from the map were probably intended to provide a general indication of the boundary. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aSEECKTS V DERWENT
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aHEDGES
690			_aBOUNDARIES, PARTY WALLS AND EASEMENTS-RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j2446/seeckts-v-derwent.htm _zView judgment on the Court Service website...
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j2446/seeckts-v-derwent.htm _zView judgment on the Court Service website...
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/judgmentsfiles/j2446/seeckts-v-derwent.htm _zView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c117178 _d117178