000			01967cam a2200337 4500
001			ABS67687
008			040429n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126057
100			_aBaker, E.
245			_aWorst case scenario: anticipating contractor insolvency - lessons from recent cases
260			_c2004
490			_aConstruction Law Journal _v20(2) 2004, 58-70(13)
520			_aComments on recent case law as part of the contractor insolvency process. Highlights that one of the client's main concerns, in the event of contractor insolvency, will be getting the job finished. Clauses in most UK construction and engineering contracts generally make provision for this eventuality. This often takes the form of making provision to give the employer rights over the contractor's plant, including the right to use it to complete the contract and to sell it. Problems arise if these provisions fail, as in "Coslett (Contractors) Ltd's Administrator v Bridgend BC" ([2001] UKHL 58, [2002] IAC 336). Cash-flow problems can also result when a contractor fails, as in "Actionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering INGL EN SpA and another" ([2003] UKHL 17, Abs66760)
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aCOSLETT (CONTRACTORS) LTD'S ADMINISTRATOR V BRIDGEND BC
650			_aACTIONSTRENGTH LTD V INTERNATIONAL GLASS ENGINEERING INGL EN SPA AND ANOTHER
650			_aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986
650			_aBRITISH EAGLE V AIR FRANCE
650			_aRE WILKINSON EX P FOWLER
650			_aRE TOUT AND FINCH LTD
650			_aMULLAN & SONS (CONTRACTORS) LIMITED V ROSS AND ANOTHER
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aPALMERS LTD V A B B POWER CONSTRUCTION LTD
650			_aSTRATHMORE BUILDING SERVICES LTD V COLIN SCOTT GREIG
650			_aCASH FLOW
650			_aInsolvency _96247
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CONTRACTS
700			_aLavers, A.
942			_n0
999			_c117271 _d117271