| 000 | 01346cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67795 | ||
| 008 | 040604n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u126419 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aStep right in | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v269(8334) 28 May 2004, 52-53(2) |
||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v423(6479) 9 June 2004, 18(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the recent case, "AWG Construction Ltd v Rockingham Motor Speedway Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 888 (TCC), [2004] TCLR 6.Here the two parties were in adjudication, but disagreements surfaced with AWG accusing R of placing new material and arguments which were very difficult to reply to. The adjudicator awarded £1.8m to R but the judge overturned this. The results of the adjudication lacked jurisdiction as issues outside of the dispute had been referred to. This had widened the issue, turning it into a different dispute. Argues that adjudicators should continue to allow further submissions but they should be within a strict timetable. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aAWG CONSTRUCTION LTD V ROCKINGHAM MOTOR SPEEDWAY LTD | ||
| 650 | _aADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aADJUDICATION PROCEDURE | ||
| 650 | _aBREACHES OF NATURAL JUSTICE | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c117479 _d117479 |
||