| 000 | 01495cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67919 | ||
| 008 | 040623n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u126590 | ||
| 245 | _aHalsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust; Steel v Joy and Halliday | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2004] 1 WLR 3002-3025(23) |
||
| 520 | _a[2004] EWCA Civ 576, 11 May 2004. Two appeals heard together that considered the question of whether a court should impose a costs sanction against a successful litigant on the grounds that he or she had refused to take part in an alternative dispute resolution or mediation process. Paras 1 to 35 explain the background to each case and the judge's reasons for dismissing claims which were upheld by CA on appeal. "Halsey" provides useful guidance as to what might be sound reasons not to mediate. View judgment at www.bailii.org. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHALSEY V MILTON KEYNES GENERAL NHS TRUST | ||
| 650 | _aMEDIATION SCHEMES | ||
| 650 | _aCOSTS | ||
| 650 | _aALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | ||
| 690 | _aDISPUTE RESOLUTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/576.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website... |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/576.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website... |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/576.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c117588 _d117588 |
||