000			01848cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS67923
008			040629n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126614
245			_aR (on the application of Fisher) v English Nature
260			_c2004
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2005] JPL 83-116(34)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 663, 26 May 2004. The appellants (F) had objected to the designation of their farmland as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 s28. The site had been designated a SSSI to protect an internationally important population of stone curlews and could also be considered a special protection area. The judge held that English Heritage (E) had been right to declare the area an SSSI once it was satisfied that the statutory criteria had been met. E had been entitled to both notify and confirm the SSSI. F had objected to the designation, arguing that it breached their right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under the "Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms First Protocol Art 1. "Held": the appeal was dismissed. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aR V ENGLISH NATURE EX P FISHER
650			_aSITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST
650			_aWILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 S28
650			_aSPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS
650			_aPROTECTED SPECIES
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS FIRST PROTOCOL ART 1
690			_aENVIRONMENT-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/663.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/663.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c117600 _d117600