000			01695cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS67921
008			040630n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126657
100			_aFranklin, K.
245		4	_aThe extraordinarily sensitive problem of liability in nuisance
260			_c2004
490			_aArchitects' Journal _v219(23) 10 June 2004, 44(1)
520			_aDiscusses the issue of nuisance. In "Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v CJ Morris" ([2004] EWCA Civ 172, [2004] All ER D (342) Feb) it was decided whether it was foreseeable that magnetic radiation, caused by the installation of a new track circuit as part of a railway signalling system, would cause interference at a recording studio 80 metres away. Also discusses "Robinson v Kilvert" (CA, 41 ChD 88) where paper and twine manufacturer Robinson and Co rented a ground floor from the Kilvert family. When the Kilvert family started to manufacture paper boxes in the basement, the process used damaged the paper stocks above. Both cases conclude that liability in nuisance depends on whether it can be foreseen, which is unlikely if the nuisance concerns an unlikely result. View "Network Rail" at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD V C J MORRIS
650			_aELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aLIABILITY
650			_aROBINSON V KILVERT
690			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/172.htm _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/172.htm _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c117627 _d117627