000			01349cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS67961
008			040701n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126671
100			_aMurdoch, S.
245		2	_aA question of identity
260			_c2004
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0425) 19 June 2004, 169(1)
520			_aConsiders "Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister" ([2004] EWCA Civ 410, Abs65566) which questions the enforcement of a restrictive covenant where it is annexed to the land intended to be benefited. Where a restrictive covenant relates to the vendor's retained land, the Law of Property Act 1925 s78 annexes the benefit of the covenant to that land as land, a principle laid down in "Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd" (CA, [1979] 254 EG 39). However the document imposing the covenant must identify the land to be benefited. If not s78 of the 1925 Act will not apply.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aCREST NICHOLSON RESIDENTIAL (SOUTH) LTD V MCALLISTER
650			_aFEDERATED HOMES LTD V MILL LODGE PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aMARQUESS OF ZETLAND V DRIVER
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aREGISTERED TITLE
650			_aNEIGHBOURING LAND
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S78
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW
942			_n0
999			_c117636 _d117636