000 02264cam a2200289 4500
001 ABS68049
008 040707n2004 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u126730
245 _aSouth Bucks DC and another v Porter (No 2)
260 _c2004
490 _aWeekly Law Reports
_v[2004] 1 WLR 1953-1970(18)
520 _a[2004] UKHL 33, 1 July 2004. Appeal by appellant (P) against CA decision ([2003] EWCA Civ 687, [2004] JPL 207) which overturned the HC judgment ([2002] EWHC 2136 (Admin), [2002] All ER (D) 342 (Oct)) dismissing S's application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288 to quash a decision of the SoS given by his appointed inspector. Prior to the HC determination, the inspector had granted planning permission subject to two special conditions including one personal to P which took into account her status as a gypsy, the unavailability of alternative sites and chronic ill-health as outlined in para 16. The HC upheld the planning permission but the CA allowed S's appeal under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288 on the basis that the decision was "ultra vires" and the inspector had failed to give adequate reasons. P appealed with support of SoS. HL overturned CA decision upholding the HC judgement. The planning inspector's reasons for granting planning permission was clear and ample. (See also Abs66831, Abs65647, Abs66547 and Abs67756). View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk.
590 _aABS
590 _aABS
590 _aABS
650 _aSOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
650 _aPLANNING PERMISSION
650 _aMATERIAL CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES
650 _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
650 _aGYPSIES
650 _aUNLAWFUL USE
690 _aPLANNING-CASE LAW
856 _uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040701/south-1.htm
_zView judgment on the UK Parliament website...
856 _uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040701/south-1.htm
_zView judgment on the UK Parliament website...
856 _uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040701/south-1.htm
_zView judgment on the UK Parliament website...
942 _n0
999 _c117665
_d117665