| 000 | 01277cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS67980 | ||
| 008 | 040714n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u126779 | ||
| 245 | _aMcAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aFarm Tax Brief _v19(5) June 2004, 7-8(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson and another" ([2004] EWCA Civ 214, Abs67572) which considered the relevant principles governing the extent to which an easement, granted by implication of a conveyance, could still be enjoyed by the owner of the dominant land, who had redeveloped the land and thereby changed its use. Previously "Attwood v Bovis Homes" (ChD, X113239) allowed a drainage easement to be used as the new purpose of the dominant land imposed no greater burden on the servient land. However, in "McAdams" the judge held that the implied easement was not available. The case raised and clarified several points of general law. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMCADAMS HOMES LTD V ROBINSON AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aATTWOOD AND OTHERS V BOVIS HOMES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aIMPLIED EASEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS | ||
| 650 | _aCHANGE OF USE | ||
| 690 | _aBOUNDARIES, PARTY WALLS AND EASEMENTS-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c117697 _d117697 |
||