000			01934cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS68015
008			040715n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126787
100			_aBrewer, G.
245			_aPayment provisions
260			_c2004
490			_aContract Journal _v424(6481) 23 June 2004, 22(1)
520			_aDiscusses "Alstom Signalling Ltd v Jarvis Facilities Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 1232 (TCC), [2004] All ER (D) 02 (Jun)), which concerned payment and withholding issues under cost reimburseable contracts. A subcontracted J to supply signalling equipment for a Railtrack project. Under the IChemE Model Form of Conditions of Contract for Process Plants, the subcontract stated J would be paid what the works cost, plus a management fee. When a dispute arose regarding the terms of the contract, J claimed it should be paid the entirity of what was due and the case went to adjudication. J was awarded an interim amount against A, but A appealed when dispute arose over the final amount. The claimant A sought a declaration regarding the terms of the subcontract with J and to recover a contribution to the total loss it claimed to have suffered under the main contract. "Held": J was not entitled to a summary judgment and the adjudicator's decision was set aside. Judgment available to view at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aALSTOM SIGNALLING LTD V JARVIS FACILITIES LTD
650			_aCOST REIMBURSABLE CONTRACTS
650			_aICHEME MODEL FORM OF CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR PROCESS PLANTS
650			_aADJUDICATION
650			_aBUILDING CONTRACTS
650			_aWITHHOLDING NOTICES
690			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2004/1285.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2004/1285.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c117703 _d117703