000			01790cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS68018
008			040716n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u126817
245			_aWestminster Building Co Ltd v Andrew Beckingham
260			_c2004
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2004] BLR 163-171(9)
520			_a[2004] EWHC 138 (TCC), 20 February 2004. Westminster (W) entered into a contract with Beckingham (B) for the refurbishment of a property. After the works commenced a dispute arose as to the form of contract. W maintained that JCT standard terms and an adjudication procedure had been incorporated into the contract. B did not pay on interim certificates, claiming a term in the contract capped the amount he was required to pay. W took thematter to adjudication, relying on the standard terms. Adjudicator ruled in favour of W, but B did not comply. "Held": adjudicator judged B had seen the form containing the standard terms, and although he did not sign it, he did not object to its contents; B had no grounds for challenging the adjudicators decision. View judgment at www.bailli.org.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aJCT CONTRACTS
650			_aARBITRATION PROCEDURES
650			_aUNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS REGULATIONS 1999
650			_aSTANDARD TERMS
650			_aINTERIM CERTIFICATES
690			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2004/138.html _zView judgment on the Bailli website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2004/138.html _zView judgment on the Bailli website...
942			_n0
999			_c117721 _d117721