| 000 | 01586cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68100 | ||
| 008 | 040810n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u127039 | ||
| 100 | _aMansfield, J. | ||
| 245 | _aDevelopments in conservation policy: the evolving role of the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Architectural Conservation _v10(2) July 2004, 50-65(16) |
||
| 520 | _aThe quality of urban design, particularly in the historic urban environment, has been recognised as a key issue in achieving the much publicised urban renaissance. To redress the apparent loss of quality that has occurred over the last 30 years, the government has sponsored a number of initiatives that promote design through influence rather than by control. The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) has been given the opportunity to comment on a array of private and public sector design issues. Yet, in the short time since its introduction, CABE has evolved rapidly and has begun to present a more pervasive agenda that goes beyond mere guidance. This is problematic and indicates the potential introduction of a series of non-regulated requirements that need to be addressed by developers in their design solutions. [Taken from journal abstract]. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMISSION FOR ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN RENAISSANCE | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN DESIGN | ||
| 650 | _aCONSERVATION POLICY | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING CONSERVATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c117830 _d117830 |
||