000			01877cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS68161
008			040820n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u127119
245			_aUglow v Uglow and others
260			_c2004
520			_a[2004] EWCA (Civ) 987, 27 July 2004. Considers the inheritance dispute between two members of the Uglow family. Richard Uglow (R) claims that the farm was left to him in an oral agreement nearly 30 years ago but a more recent will leaves it to Peter Uglow (P). R appealed against the dismissal of his counterclaim for the transfer to him of the freehold interest in land made during possession proceedings brought against him by the executors of the disputed will. "Held": appeal dismissed. The testator had no moral obligation to leave the farm to R. The judge had correctly applied the principles of proprietary estoppel to the facts, in accordance with "Gillett v Holt" (CA, [1998] 3 All ER 917) and "Jennings v Rice" ([2002] EWCA (Civ) 159, [2003] 1 P&CR 100). View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aUGLOW V UGLOW AND OTHERS
650			_aORAL AGREEMENT
650			_aINHERITANCE
650			_aPROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL
650			_aINTEREST IN LAND
650			_aGILLETT V HOLT
650			_aJENNINGS V RICE AND OTHERS
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=2706&searchTerm=&ascending=&index=58&maxIndex=199 _zview judgement at Court Service website...
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=2706&searchTerm=&ascending=&index=58&maxIndex=199 _zview judgement at Court Service website...
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=2706&searchTerm=&ascending=&index=58&maxIndex=199 _zview judgement at Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c117874 _d117874