000			01722cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS68180
008			040824n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u127147
100			_aO'Keefe, J.
245			_aUndone by definitions
260			_c2004
490			_aWastes Management _vAugust 2004, 44-45(2)
520			_aExamines the case "R v Swaffham Magistrates Court and another ex p Paul Rackham Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 1417 (Admin), unreported) which discussed the issue of what is the definition of waste. The claimant argued that the definition of waste was now so complicated that it was impossible for a person to determine what was waste and that their material and product were recovered products and no longer controlled waste. Paul Rackham Ltd's application for permission to apply for a judicial review was refused and the case was returned to the magistrates courts. View judgment at www.bailii.org
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aR V SWAFFHAM MAGISTRATES COURT AND ANOTHER EX P PAUL RACKHAM LTD
650			_aWASTE REGULATIONS
650			_aMAYER PARRY RECYCLING LTD V ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
650			_aDOE CIRCULAR 11/1994
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990
650			_aWASTE MANAGEMENT LICENSING REGULATIONS 1994
650			_aARCO CHEMIE NEDERLAND LTD V MINSTER VAN VOLKSHUISVESTING, RUIMTELIJKE ORDENING EN MILIEUHEBER
690			_aWASTE MANAGEMENT-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2004/1417.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2004/1417.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c117886 _d117886