000			01324cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS68275
008			040825n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u127151
100			_aSydenham, A.
245			_aPalm tree justice
260			_c2004
490			_aFarm Tax Brief _v19(7) August/September 2004, 7-8(2)
520			_aDiscusses the case, "Oxley v Hiscock" ([2004] EWCA Civ 546, Abs 67871) where the property had been conveyed in the name of Oxley but with financial contribution from Hiscock on the understanding that he would acquire an interest in the property. Considers the approach the court took on the question of the extent of the share Mrs Oxley was entitled to when the relationship broke up and the house sold. The court took the discretionary family law approach as opposed to the more rigid property law approach. Concludes that property lawyers need to ensure that there was clear evidence of discussions showing it was the parties intention to share the ownership of the property and what was the size of the shares.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aOXLEY V HISCOCK
650			_aBENEFICIAL INTEREST
650			_aSPRINGETTE V DEFOE
650			_aCONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
650			_aPROPRIETRY ESTOPPEL
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c117890 _d117890