| 000 | 01350cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68265 | ||
| 008 | 040929n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u127552 | ||
| 100 | _aRedman, V. | ||
| 245 | _aSoft fruit creates quandary | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v(1585) 3 September 2004, 15(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the conflict between residents and soft fruit growers over the use of polytunnels. Polytunnels have extended the soft fruit growing season. However planning law on polytunnels is unclear with local authorities giving conflicting advice on whether planning permission is required. PPG7 provides little guidance on when a structure will be regarded as temporary use of land rather than an operational development. Increasingly councils are expecting planning permission which will lead to more appeals and eventually to clearer guidance. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPOLYTUNNELS | ||
| 650 | _aTEMPORARY STRUCTURES | ||
| 650 | _aTEMPORARY USES OF LAND | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPPG7 | ||
| 650 | _aFRUIT PRODUCTION | ||
| 650 | _aCARDIFF RATING AUTHORITY V GUEST KEEN BALDWIN IRON AND STEEL CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aSKERRITTS OF NOTTINGHAM LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING-PLANNING LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c118079 _d118079 |
||