000			02017cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS68368
008			041021n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u127787
245			_aLough and others v First SoS
260			_c2004
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2004] 1 WLR 2557-2576(20)
520			_a[2004] EWCA Civ 905, 12 July 2004. L and others (members of an incorporated residents association) appealed against a planning inspector's decision to grant planning permission to a developer wishing to build a 20-storey building with mixed retail and restaurants on ground floor. The local authority had initially refused planning permission on the basis of loss of amenity to adjacent area and residents. This had been overturned by the planning inspector. L and others' appeal to the HC, to quash the planning permission on the grounds that the proposed development breached residents' rights of respect for their private and family life and homes under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 8 and their rights to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions under the First Protocol Art 1, was refused. "Held" that the inspector had struck a balance between the requirements of Art 8 and a landowner's right to make use ofhis land. Inspector's decision upheld. CA dismissed appeal.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aLOUGH AND OTHERS V FIRST SOS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aLOSS OF AMENITY
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS FIRST PROTOCOL ART 1
650			_aFAMILY LIFE
650			_aPRIVATE LIFE
690			_aPLANNING-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/905.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/905.html _zView judgment on the BAILII website...
942			_n0
999			_c118207 _d118207