000			01680cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS68329
008			041021n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u127792
245			_aPuttock v Bexley LBC
260			_c2004
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2004] RVR 216-128(3)
520			_aACQ/101/2003, 19 April 2004. Claimant (P) sought compensation for injurious affection under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s10 for the loss of freehold value of house due to breach of restrictive covenant. P claimed that the restrictive covenant restricting the use of land for non-residential development added 10% in value to property when he bought it. Some of the land surrounding the property including a part subject to the restrictive covenant had been acquired for a major town centre development. The restriction of the covenant having been over ridden by the local authority LT held that compensation payable for injurious affection was nil. Any claim for injurious affection under s10 of the 1965 Act was for diminution in value in the claimant's property caused by execution of the works, and the valuation date must be determined by reference to time of the works. Also notes that test of obsolescence of covenant had not been satisfied.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aPUTTOCK V BEXLEY LBC
650			_aINJURIOUS AFFECTION
650			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S10
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aDIMINUTION IN VALUE
650			_aRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY _96266
650			_aValuation _96273
690			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c118210 _d118210