| 000 | 01201cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68331 | ||
| 008 | 041022n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u127797 | ||
| 100 | _aHaniff, S. | ||
| 245 | _aFifty ways to leave your partner | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v220(11) 23 September 2004, 41-42(2) |
||
| 520 | _aOverview of considerations to be regarded when a partnership has not turned out as planned. Solutions for this may include compulsory retirement, expulsion or dissolution. Looks at "Syers v Syers" [1876] where an order was made that one partner's share of a business should be valued as if the business was sold as a going concern on the date of dissolution and that his brother should have the right to buy his share at that value. Argues this may still be regarded as an acceptable way to dissolve a partnership. Points out that the government is currently looking at the review of the Partnership Act 1890, which may update the current practice. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPARTNERSHIP ACT 1890 | ||
| 650 | _aSYERS V SYERS | ||
| 650 | _aPARTNERSHIP DISPUTES | ||
| 690 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c118213 _d118213 |
||