| 000 | 00940cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68303 | ||
| 008 | 041027n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u127835 | ||
| 100 | _aWynn, P. | ||
| 245 | _aShould this structure have been underpinned? - reflection after a quarter of a century | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 490 |
_aStructural Survey _v22(4) 2004, 190-193(4) |
||
| 520 | _aA case study of a domestic structure that suffered damage as a result of foundation movement in the 1970s is examined. Conclusions and recommendations made at the time are revisited in the light of limitations of the original site investigation and subsequent performance of the structure. Diagrams and references. [Taken from journal abstract]. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aUNDERPINNING | ||
| 650 | _aFOUNDATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSIDENCE | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c118234 _d118234 |
||