| 000 | 01473cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68430 | ||
| 008 | 041123n2004 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128095 | ||
| 245 | _aBryen and Langley Ltd v Martin Rodney Boston | ||
| 260 | _c2004 | ||
| 520 | _a[2004] EWHC 2450 (TCC), 4 November 2004. Applicant building contractor (X) applied for summary judgment against respondent (Y) to enforce an arbitrator's decision. It was intended that JCT 1998 Private with Quantities should be used between the parties and whilst a letter makes reference to the contract, Y had not signed any contract. X sought a sum from Y under an interim certificate. Y failed to pay entire amount and X referred the matter to arbitration. Y contested the jurisdiction of the arbitrator. "Held" that a letter to a building contractor which stated that the intended form of contract was the JCT 1998 Private with Quantities did not in itself incorporate the terms of the contract. Therefore, an adjudicator did not have jurisdiction to consider whether X was owed money under an interim certificate for work done. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBRYEN AND LANGLEY LTD V BOSTON | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1998 PRIVATE WITH QUANTITIES | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 | _aDISPUTE RESOLUTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c118360 _d118360 |
||