000			01413cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS68559
008			041210n2004 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u128274
100			_aBradford, K.
245			_aConfidentiality cannot always be guaranteed
260			_c2004
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0449) 4 December 2004, 126-128(3)
520			_aDefines and clarifies differences between disclosure and privilege using examples of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 scenarios as illustrations. Discusses the implications of "Three Rivers DC v Bank of England" ([2004] UKHL 48) which clearly defines the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege. Warns that confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed. View judgment at www.publications.parliament.uk.
590			_aABS
590			_aABS
650			_aCONFIDENTIALITY
650			_aDISCLOSURE
650			_aTHREE RIVERS DC V BANK OF ENGLAND
650			_aPRIVILEGE
650			_aLITIGATION
650			_aWITHOUT PREJUDICE
650			_aLEGAL ADVICE
650			_aUSA V PHILIP MORRIS INC (NO 1)
690			_aLAW
700			_aHatton, B.
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd041111/riv-1.htm _zView judgment on UK Parliament website...
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd041111/riv-1.htm _zView judgment on UK Parliament website...
942			_n0
999			_c118433 _d118433